Governance, compliance, and responsible sourcing in one review point.
Before deeper bullion engagement begins, serious counterparties need to understand how COMFI frames onboarding, due diligence, sourcing review, document control, and policy access. This page brings those trust rails together for refineries, banks, bullion traders, wholesalers, and qualified clients.
A practical review point before engagement
Use this page to understand what COMFI makes visible publicly, and what information is handled through onboarding or direct counterparty review.
What different counterparties need to review.
The page is general by design, but it should still answer the practical questions that professional visitors bring to a bullion relationship.
Refineries
Refineries need to see that sourcing questions, product documentation, counterparty review, and escalation are treated as part of the trading process, not as a separate statement.
Banks and financial counterparties
Banks and financial counterparties need clarity on onboarding discipline, KYC / KYB expectations, AML/CFT awareness, document control, and the route for formal review.
Qualified clients and partners
Qualified clients need a clear next step, realistic public information, and a professional route into review without retail-style promises or unsupported claims.
Bullion traders and wholesalers
Trading counterparties need to understand that engagement is structured, documentation-led, and focused on professional physical bullion relationships.
How governance supports bullion engagement.
COMFI’s public governance framework should make the review process legible without exposing sensitive internal procedures, commercial terms, or private counterparty records.
- Structured onboarding: Formal engagement begins through onboarding so the relationship starts with the right information and review path.
- Documented assessment: Counterparty, entity, product, source, transaction, and logistics information can be reviewed according to the nature of the relationship.
- Responsible sourcing review: Sourcing concerns are connected to due diligence, documentation, policy expectations, and escalation where needed.
- Governance escalation: Material concerns should move to further review, mitigation, escalation, or decline rather than informal approval.
- Public documentation: Approved policies, notices, and summaries should be organized clearly and dated when published.
From public review to formal onboarding
Public information gives counterparties the first layer of clarity. Formal documents and transaction-specific review belong inside onboarding or direct engagement.
The three parts of the governance page.
Compliance and governance before engagement
COMFI makes its onboarding posture, counterparty review approach, document discipline, and escalation logic visible before deeper commercial discussion begins.
Responsible sourcing inside the trade workflow
Responsible sourcing is treated as part of bullion trading discipline, connected to counterparty review, product and source information, documentation, and governance attention where needed.
Policy library and document control
Public policies and notices should be easy to find, version-aware, and honest about status. Do not show a document or “available on request” path unless it is real.
Documents should support review, not decorate the page.
The policy layer should help serious visitors understand COMFI’s operating posture. Public materials should be concise, approved, and maintained. Sensitive records should stay within onboarding or direct review.
If the review is serious, move into onboarding.
Use onboarding for formal counterparty engagement. Use contact only if the inquiry sits outside the standard onboarding path.